Touring Commuter
Sunday, 13 January 2013
Sunday in the Pub
Thursday, 27 January 2011
Translate
In poor English (Actually US office BLX)
Following the confusion generated by yesterday's announcement by the Spanish Cycling Federation (RFEC) on the case of Alberto Contador – particularly concerning the "interim decision" of which the rider was notified – widely covered by the media, the UCI is obliged to clarify that this information cannot in any way be considered as an anticipation of the definitive decision in the case.
To date, Alberto Contador has not received a sanction and the UCI still awaits – in accordance with the provisions of its own regulations and those of the World Anti-Doping Code – to be informed of the decision of the RFEC Disciplinary Commission that should be provided as soon as possible.
The document that was forwarded to the UCI this afternoon by the RFEC only represents one element of the disciplinary proceedings undertaken by the Spanish Federation – and upon which the rider may express an opinion before being subject to the ruling – and cannot be used for the purpose of a potential appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in Lausanne.
Only the definitive decision, that must be issued by the RFEC, can fulfil this purpose – within the time period established by the regulations – for the UCI, for WADA and for the rider himself.
Considering the major media interest in the case, the UCI regrets the inappropriate speculation that has characterised the proceedings and expresses its desire that this affair be drawn to a conclusion in an orderly fashion.
IN GOOGLE FRENCH
À la suite de la confusion générée par l'annonce faite hier par la Fédération espagnole de cyclisme (RFEC) sur le cas d'Alberto Contador - en particulier concernant la «décision provisoire» dont le coureur a été notifié - largement couverte par les médias, l'UCI est obligé de préciser que cette information ne peut en aucune manière être considéré comme une anticipation de la décision définitive dans le cas.
À ce jour, Alberto Contador n'a pas reçu de sanction et de l'UCI attend toujours - en conformité avec les dispositions de ses propres règlements et celles du Code mondial antidopage - d'être informé de la décision de la Commission de discipline RFEC qui devraient être fournis dès que possible.
Le document qui a été transmis à l'UCI cet après-midi par la RFEC ne représente qu'un élément de la procédure disciplinaire menée par la Fédération espagnole - et sur lequel le coureur peut exprimer une opinion avant d'être soumis à la décision - et ne peuvent pas être utilisés à des fins d'un potentiel de s'adresser à la Cour d'Arbitrage du Sport (TAS) à Lausanne.
Seule la décision définitive, qui doit être délivré par la RFEC, peut atteindre ce but - dans le délai établi par les règlements - pour l'UCI, l'AMA et pour le coureur lui-même.
Considérant l'intérêt majeur des médias dans le cas, l'UCI regrette la spéculation inappropriée qui a caractérisé la procédure et exprime son désir que cette affaire soit tirée une conclusion de façon ordonnée.
In Google Italian
A seguito della confusione generata dall'annuncio di ieri del Ciclismo Federazione spagnola (RFEC) sul caso di Alberto Contador - relative in particolare alla "decisione provvisoria" di cui è stato notificato il pilota - ampiamente coperta dai media, l'UCI è tenuto a chiarire che questo informazioni non possono in alcun modo essere considerato come un anticipo della decisione definitiva sul caso.
Ad oggi, Alberto Contador non ha ricevuto una sanzione e l'UCI attende ancora - in conformità con le disposizioni del proprio regolamento e quelle del mondiale anti-doping Code - di essere informato della decisione della commissione di disciplina RFEC Commissione che dovrebbero essere previsti il più presto possibile.
Il documento che è stato trasmesso al UCI questo pomeriggio dalla RFEC rappresenta solo un elemento del procedimento disciplinare intrapreso dalla Federazione spagnola - e sulla quale il pilota può esprimere un parere, prima di essere soggetto alla sentenza - e non possono essere utilizzati ai fini di un potenziale ricorso al Tribunale Arbitrale dello Sport (CAS) di Losanna.
Solo la decisione definitiva, che deve essere rilasciato dalla RFEC, può adempiere a questo scopo - entro il termine stabilito dai regolamenti - per l'UCI, per la WADA e per lo stesso pilota.
Considerando il grande interesse dei media, nel caso, l'UCI si rammarica della speculazione inadeguato che ha caratterizzato il procedimento ed esprime il suo desiderio che questa vicenda da trarre ad una conclusione in modo ordinato.
IN Google Swahili
Kufuatia machafuko yanayotokana na kutangazwa jana na Kihispania Cycling Shirikisho (RFEC) katika kesi ya Alberto Contador - hasa juu ya "mpito uamuzi" ambayo mpanda farasi ilijulishwa - sana kufunikwa na vyombo vya habari, UCI ni wajibu na kufafanua kuwa hii habari haiwezi kwa njia yoyote kuchukuliwa kama kutarajia uamuzi wa slutgiltig katika kesi hiyo.
Hadi sasa, Alberto Contador haijawahi kupokea adhabu na bado UCI watapata - kwa mujibu wa masharti ya kanuni zake mwenyewe na wale wa Dunia wa Kupambana na dopning Code - kwa kuwa taarifa ya uamuzi wa Tume ya RFEC nidhamu ambazo zinapaswa kutolewa haraka iwezekanavyo.
Hati ya kwamba alikuwa kupelekwa kwa UCI mchana huu na RFEC tu inawakilisha moja kipengele cha kesi nidhamu uliofanywa na Shirikisho la Kihispania - na juu ambayo mpanda farasi inaweza kutoa maoni kabla ya kuwa chini ya chama tawala - na haiwezi kutumika kwa madhumuni ya uwezekano wa kukata rufaa kwa Mahakama ya Usuluhishi ya Michezo (CAS) katika Lausanne.
Tu uamuzi slutgiltig, ambayo ni lazima iliyotolewa na RFEC, unaweza kutimiza lengo - ndani ya kipindi cha muda uliowekwa na kanuni - kwa ajili ya UCI, kwa Wada na kwa ajili ya mpanda farasi mwenyewe.
Kuzingatia maslahi makubwa ya vyombo vya habari katika kesi hiyo, majuto UCI uvumi muafaka ambayo ina sifa ya kesi na huonyesha hamu yake kwamba jambo hili kuwa inayotolewa na hitimisho katika mtindo wa utaratibu mzuri.
In all languages. Utter spineless tosh
Saturday, 18 September 2010
Henderson wins Tour of Britain
Henderson wins Tour of Britain points jersey in near miss for Team Sky. A whole world of difference.
It's cheering to know that the grauniad managed to publish a reasonable amount of BLX with little effort. Henderson didn't come close to winning owt but the points jersey and Sky came close to sod all.
Friday, 17 September 2010
Six Degrees of Separation

I'm new to this blogging malarkey. For years I have been an opinionated individual in bars, work and elsewhere. Free speech is one of the joys of modern life. I would have said of the western world but I don't possess an iBan and Tal will get p***ed off. Back to the thread. Through the eater of time that is Google Reader I follow some work/cycling orientated blogs so I have a hope of keeping the company blog and facebook page reasonably current and interesting. Lockring Not Included has been a heart warming discovery. Simple pictures that say so much, with an understated heading. This entry is already one paragraph and a sentence too long.
On Wednesday this appeared. Nice picture, thought I, understated content. I commented online.
Friday night, Tom Waits territory, a three quarter moon slung in an obsidian sky. Meeting and old friend in an English ale house. There is a chalk board with tonight's ales, near the bottom, with no price swim some Dogfish Ales on draught. Customers ask the price. If you have to ask you can't afford it, £9 a pint. At 14% it's three times the strength of a session ale so three times the price to calm the nutters is fine. But there on the shelf, away from everything else on the shelf, in parenthesis, quotated, read the following words; Dogfish Head World Wide Stout. ABV 21%! We all avoided it. Well there is only the one bottle, as opposed to the kegs of other Dogfish in the cellar.
Fxdwhl. Did they fib? Or, did 21% just rumple your memory. However, please find attached a picture of three pumps in a twilight alehouse sporting all American fine ales. Thank ye kindly. (Poor piccie from a mobile phone)
Neil